On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 10:51:47PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > > > On 2018/10/19 下午9:42, David Sterba wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 07:17:23PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > >> This patchset can be fetched from github: > >> https://github.com/adam900710/linux/tree/qgroup_balance_skip_trees > >> > >> Which is still based on v4.19-rc1, but with previous submitted patches > >> as dependency. > > > > Please rebase this patchset on top of misc-4.20, this should not change > > as it's going to be the 1st pull. > > > > I tried to pull the git branch and rebase but there were several > > conflicts and some of the paches appeared duplicated so the rebase did > > not recognize the changes as identical. > > > > Applying patches from mails causes other sort of conflicts and I can't > > seem to get a compilable version. > > > > This is not urgent as I want to put the patchset to a topic branch and > > give it some testing before it goes to for-next. Thanks. > > Current patchset (still using while(rb_first()) for cleanup > swapped_blocks) rebased to misc-4.20. > With all checkpatch errors fixed. > > The branch is: > https://github.com/adam900710/linux/tree/qgroup_delayed_subtree_rebased Thanks. > Please note that this is only for test purpose. > Due to explained reasons, I don't really think it should go misc-next > right now. Ok. Misc-next is for things that pass some review and testing, the rest is in for-next and can be delayed or dropped as needed.
