On 2018/10/2 0:48, David Sterba wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 11:47:04AM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 04:35:45PM +0800, zhong jiang wrote:
>>> Trival cleanup, list_move_tail will implement the same function that
>>> list_del() + list_add_tail() will do. hence just replace them.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> fs/btrfs/send.c | 3 +--
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/send.c b/fs/btrfs/send.c
>>> index 094cc144..d87f416 100644
>>> --- a/fs/btrfs/send.c
>>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/send.c
>>> @@ -2075,8 +2075,7 @@ static struct name_cache_entry *name_cache_search(struct send_ctx *sctx,
>>> */
>>> static void name_cache_used(struct send_ctx *sctx, struct name_cache_entry *nce)
>>> {
>>> - list_del(&nce->list);
>>> - list_add_tail(&nce->list, &sctx->name_cache_list);
>>> + list_move_tail(&nce->list, &sctx->name_cache_list);
>>> }
>> At that point do we even need such a trivial helper, considering that
>> this is only called in one place?
> Fair point and trivial one-line helpers are on the cleanup todo list.
> The exception is when the actual helper implementation is obscuring the
> semantics and the helper is used in many places so it's not practical to
> add a comment everywhere. But it's not the case here.
>
> Zhong Jiang, please update the patch and resend, thanks.
Will add a comment here and resend in v2.
Thanks,
zhong jiang
> .
>
