18.09.2018 21:57, Chris Murphy пишет: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> 18.09.2018 08:37, Chris Murphy пишет: > >>> The patches aren't upstream yet? Will they be? >>> >> >> I do not know. Personally I think much easier is to make grub location >> independent of /boot, allowing grub be installed in separate partition. >> This automatically covers all other cases (like MD, LVM etc). > > The only case where I'm aware of this happens is Fedora on UEFI where > they write grubenv and grub.cfg on the FAT ESP. I'm pretty sure > upstream expects grubenv and grub.cfg at /boot/grub and I haven't ever > seen it elsewhere (except Fedora on UEFI). > > I'm not sure this is much easier. Yet another volume that would be > persistently mounted? Where? A nested mount at /boot/grub? I'm not > liking that at all. Even Windows and macOS have saner and simpler to > understand booting methods than this. > > That's exactly what Windows ended up with - separate boot volume with bootloader related files.
