On 30.08.2018 20:42, Josef Bacik wrote: > + if (flush_state == ALLOC_CHUNK_FORCE && !commit_cycles) > + flush_state++; This is a bit obscure. So if we allocated a chunk and !commit_cycles just break from the loop? What's the reasoning behind this ?
On 30.08.2018 20:42, Josef Bacik wrote: > + if (flush_state == ALLOC_CHUNK_FORCE && !commit_cycles) > + flush_state++; This is a bit obscure. So if we allocated a chunk and !commit_cycles just break from the loop? What's the reasoning behind this ?
![]() |