Re: [PATCH 23/35] btrfs: assert on non-empty delayed iputs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 01:42:13PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> I ran into an issue where there was some reference being held on an
> inode that I couldn't track.  This assert wasn't triggered, but it at
> least rules out we're doing something stupid.

Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxx>

> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> index 0e42401756b8..11ea2ea7439e 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> @@ -3979,6 +3979,7 @@ void close_ctree(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
>  	kthread_stop(fs_info->transaction_kthread);
>  	kthread_stop(fs_info->cleaner_kthread);
>  
> +	ASSERT(list_empty(&fs_info->delayed_iputs));
>  	set_bit(BTRFS_FS_CLOSING_DONE, &fs_info->flags);
>  
>  	btrfs_free_qgroup_config(fs_info);
> -- 
> 2.14.3
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux