Re: [PATCH 01/35] btrfs: add btrfs_delete_ref_head helper

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 30.08.2018 20:41, Josef Bacik wrote:
> From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxx>
> 
> We do this dance in cleanup_ref_head and check_ref_cleanup, unify it
> into a helper and cleanup the calling functions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.h |  3 ++-
>  fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 24 ++++--------------------
>  3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.c b/fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.c
> index 62ff545ba1f7..3a9e4ac21794 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.c
> @@ -393,6 +393,20 @@ btrfs_select_ref_head(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
>  	return head;
>  }
>  
> +void btrfs_delete_ref_head(struct btrfs_delayed_ref_root *delayed_refs,
> +			   struct btrfs_delayed_ref_head *head)
> +{
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&delayed_refs->lock);
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&head->lock);
> +
> +	rb_erase(&head->href_node, &delayed_refs->href_root);
> +	RB_CLEAR_NODE(&head->href_node);
> +	atomic_dec(&delayed_refs->num_entries);
> +	delayed_refs->num_heads--;
> +	if (head->processing == 0)
> +		delayed_refs->num_heads_ready--;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Helper to insert the ref_node to the tail or merge with tail.
>   *
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.h b/fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.h
> index d9f2a4ebd5db..7769177b489e 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.h
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.h
> @@ -261,7 +261,8 @@ static inline void btrfs_delayed_ref_unlock(struct btrfs_delayed_ref_head *head)
>  {
>  	mutex_unlock(&head->mutex);
>  }
> -
> +void btrfs_delete_ref_head(struct btrfs_delayed_ref_root *delayed_refs,
> +			   struct btrfs_delayed_ref_head *head);
>  
>  struct btrfs_delayed_ref_head *
>  btrfs_select_ref_head(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans);
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> index f77226d8020a..6799950fa057 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> @@ -2492,12 +2492,9 @@ static int cleanup_ref_head(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>  		spin_unlock(&delayed_refs->lock);
>  		return 1;
>  	}
> -	delayed_refs->num_heads--;
> -	rb_erase(&head->href_node, &delayed_refs->href_root);
> -	RB_CLEAR_NODE(&head->href_node);
> -	spin_unlock(&head->lock);
> +	btrfs_delete_ref_head(delayed_refs, head);
>  	spin_unlock(&delayed_refs->lock);
> -	atomic_dec(&delayed_refs->num_entries);
> +	spin_unlock(&head->lock);
>  

Again, the feedback of reversed lock-order is not addressed:

https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg80482.html

>  	trace_run_delayed_ref_head(fs_info, head, 0);
>  
> @@ -6984,22 +6981,9 @@ static noinline int check_ref_cleanup(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>  	if (!mutex_trylock(&head->mutex))
>  		goto out;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * at this point we have a head with no other entries.  Go
> -	 * ahead and process it.
> -	 */
> -	rb_erase(&head->href_node, &delayed_refs->href_root);
> -	RB_CLEAR_NODE(&head->href_node);
> -	atomic_dec(&delayed_refs->num_entries);
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * we don't take a ref on the node because we're removing it from the
> -	 * tree, so we just steal the ref the tree was holding.
> -	 */
> -	delayed_refs->num_heads--;
> -	if (head->processing == 0)
> -		delayed_refs->num_heads_ready--;
> +	btrfs_delete_ref_head(delayed_refs, head);
>  	head->processing = 0;
> +
>  	spin_unlock(&head->lock);
>  	spin_unlock(&delayed_refs->lock);
>  
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux