We can actually allocate new chunks while we're creating our bg's, so
instead of doing list_for_each_safe, just do while (!list_empty()) so we
make sure to catch any new bg's that get added to the list.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index ca98c39308f6..fc30ff96f0d6 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -10331,7 +10331,7 @@ int btrfs_read_block_groups(struct btrfs_fs_info *info)
void btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = trans->fs_info;
- struct btrfs_block_group_cache *block_group, *tmp;
+ struct btrfs_block_group_cache *block_group;
struct btrfs_root *extent_root = fs_info->extent_root;
struct btrfs_block_group_item item;
struct btrfs_key key;
@@ -10339,7 +10339,10 @@ void btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
bool can_flush_pending_bgs = trans->can_flush_pending_bgs;
trans->can_flush_pending_bgs = false;
- list_for_each_entry_safe(block_group, tmp, &trans->new_bgs, bg_list) {
+ while (!list_empty(&trans->new_bgs)) {
+ block_group = list_first_entry(&trans->new_bgs,
+ struct btrfs_block_group_cache,
+ bg_list);
if (ret)
goto next;
--
2.14.3
