Re: btrfs fi du unreliable?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2018-08-29 08:00 AM, Jorge Bastos wrote:

> 
> Look for example at snapshots from July 21st and 22nd, total used
> space went from 199 to 277GiB, this is mostly from new added files, as
> I confirmed from browsing those snapshots, there were no changes on
> the 23rd, and a lot of files were deleted before the 24th, so should't
> there be about 80GiB of exclusive content for the 22nd, or am I
> misunderstanding how this is reported? ? Those were new files only,
> never existed on previous snapshots, If I delete both snapshots from
> the 22nd and the 23rd I expect to get about 80GiB freed space.

Exclusive means... exclusive... to that 1 snapshop/subvolume.  If the
data also exists on the 23'rd snapshot, it's not exclusive.

If you wanted to report how much data is exclusive to a group of
snapshots, (say, July 22 *and* 23rd). you would have to make them
members of a parent qgroup, then, you could see the exclusive value of
the whole group.

begin:vcard
fn:Remi Gauvin
n:Gauvin;Remi
org:Georgian Infotech
adr:;;3-51 Sykes St. N.;Meaford;ON;N4L 1X3;Canada
email;internet:remi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
tel;work:226-256-1545
version:2.1
end:vcard


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux