Re: [PATCH v2] btrfs: btrfs_shrink_device should call commit transaction

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 06:12:37PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> test case btrfs/164 reported UAF..
> 
> [ 6712.084324] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> ::
> [ 6712.195423]  btrfs_update_commit_device_size+0x75/0xf0 [btrfs]
> [ 6712.201424]  btrfs_commit_transaction+0x57d/0xa90 [btrfs]
> [ 6712.206999]  btrfs_rm_device+0x627/0x850 [btrfs]
> [ 6712.211800]  btrfs_ioctl+0x2b03/0x3120 [btrfs]
> ::
> 
> reason for this is that btrfs_shrink_device() adds the device resized to
> the fs_devices::resized_devices after it has called the last commit
> transaction.
> So the list fs_devices::resized_devices is not empty when
> btrfs_shrink_device() returns.
> Now the parent function btrfs_rm_device() calls
>         btrfs_close_bdev(device);
>         call_rcu(&device->rcu, free_device_rcu);
> and then does the commit transaction.
> The commit transaction goes through the fs_devices::resized_devices
> in btrfs_update_commit_device_size() and leads to UAF.
> 
> Fix this by making sure btrfs_shrink_device() calls the last needed
> btrfs_commit_transaction() before the return.
> 
> Reported-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

The transaction commit makes more sense here, also is consistent with
what grow does.

Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux