[PATCH 4/5] btrfs: remove a useless return statement in btrfs_block_rsv_add

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Since ret must be 0 here, don't have to return separately in advance.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index 4fb20f77d6b1..8bebf122d4b3 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -5539,10 +5539,8 @@ int btrfs_block_rsv_add(struct btrfs_root *root,
 		return 0;
 
 	ret = reserve_metadata_bytes(root, block_rsv, num_bytes, flush);
-	if (!ret) {
+	if (!ret)
 		block_rsv_add_bytes(block_rsv, num_bytes, true);
-		return 0;
-	}
 
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
2.18.0



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux