On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 02:38:59PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > This patches can be fetched from github: > https://github.com/adam900710/btrfs-progs/tree/qgroup_report > > It's possible that certain timed power loss could lead to initialized quota > tree without rescan kicked in. > Can be reproduced in btrfs/166 with low possibility. > > In that case, since default flags for QUOTA_STATUS is ON|INCONSISTENT, > btrfs check will still check qgroups and report difference as error. > > However rescan progress of QUOTA_STATUS is still 0, means qgroup rescan > hasn't been kicked in, and all quota numbers are 0, difference is > expected. > > In this case, make btrfs check don't report such uninitialized rescan as > error. > > Qu Wenruo (2): > btrfs-progs: qgroup-verify: Don't treat qgroup difference as error if > the fs hasn't initialized a rescan > btrfs-progs: fsck-tests: Add test image to check if btrfs check > reports uninitialized rescan as error Applied, thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
