Although it is safe to call this on paths that no locks or extent buffers held, removing the redundant btrfs_release_path is reasonable. Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index b8c131b82978..7e56a203c109 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -4137,7 +4137,6 @@ static int btrfs_unlink_subvol(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, leaf = path->nodes[0]; btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(leaf, &key, path->slots[0]); - btrfs_release_path(path); index = key.offset; } btrfs_release_path(path); -- 2.18.0 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
