[PATCH 13/22] btrfs: reset max_extent_size properly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



If we use up our block group before allocating a new one we'll easily
get a max_extent_size that's set really really low, which will result in
a lot of fragmentation.  We need to make sure we're resetting the
max_extent_size when we add a new chunk or add new space.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index c20675c265c5..e057d9b2d959 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -4657,6 +4657,7 @@ static int do_chunk_alloc(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 			goto out;
 	} else {
 		ret = 1;
+		space_info->max_extent_size = 0;
 	}
 
 	space_info->force_alloc = CHUNK_ALLOC_NO_FORCE;
@@ -8199,10 +8200,16 @@ static int __btrfs_free_reserved_extent(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
 	if (pin)
 		pin_down_extent(fs_info, cache, start, len, 1);
 	else {
+		struct btrfs_space_info *space_info = cache->space_info;
+
 		if (btrfs_test_opt(fs_info, DISCARD))
 			ret = btrfs_discard_extent(fs_info, start, len, NULL);
 		btrfs_add_free_space(cache, start, len);
 		btrfs_free_reserved_bytes(cache, len, delalloc);
+
+		spin_lock(&space_info->lock);
+		space_info->max_extent_size = 0;
+		spin_unlock(&space_info->lock);
 		trace_btrfs_reserved_extent_free(fs_info, start, len);
 	}
 
-- 
2.14.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux