Re: [bug report] btrfs: Add type check when reading a chunk

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 08:18:25AM +0000, Gu, Jinxiang wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dan Carpenter [mailto:dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2018 4:11 PM
> > To: Gu, Jinxiang/顾 金香 <gujx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [bug report] btrfs: Add type check when reading a chunk
> > 
> > Hello Gu Jinxiang,
> > 
> > The patch 72e75ed03c8d: "btrfs: Add type check when reading a chunk"
> > from Jul 4, 2018, leads to the following static checker warning:
> > 
> > 	fs/btrfs/volumes.c:6388 btrfs_check_chunk_valid()
> > 	warn: AND to zero '0x4 & 0x1'
> > 
> > fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> >   6356          if (!is_power_of_2(stripe_len) || stripe_len != BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN) {
> >   6357                  btrfs_err(fs_info, "invalid chunk stripe length: %llu",
> >   6358                            stripe_len);
> >   6359                  return -EIO;
> >   6360          }
> >   6361          if (~(BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK | BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_PROFILE_MASK) &
> >   6362              type) {
> >   6363                  btrfs_err(fs_info, "unrecognized chunk type: %llu",
> >   6364                            ~(BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK |
> >   6365                              BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_PROFILE_MASK) &
> >   6366                            btrfs_chunk_type(leaf, chunk));
> >   6367                  return -EIO;
> >   6368          }
> >   6369
> >   6370          if ((type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK) == 0) {
> >   6371                  btrfs_err(fs_info, "missing chunk type flag: %llu", type);
> >   6372                  return -EIO;
> >   6373          }
> >   6374
> >   6375          if ((type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM) &&
> >   6376              (type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA | BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA))) {
> >   6377                  btrfs_err(fs_info,
> >   6378                          "system chunk with data or metadata type: %llu", type);
> >   6379                  return -EIO;
> >   6380          }
> >   6381
> >   6382          features = btrfs_super_incompat_flags(fs_info->super_copy);
> >   6383          if (features & BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_MIXED_GROUPS)
> >   6384                  mixed = 1;
> >   6385
> >   6386          if (!mixed) {
> >   6387                  if (type &
> >   6388                      (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA)) {
> >                              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > Was this supposed to be | or perhaps check that both are set?
> Yes. It should be |.
> Thank you, I'll send a patch to fix it.

Not needed, I'll fix the patch directly.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux