RE: [PATCH v2] btrfs: Add chunk type check in read a chunk

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nikolay Borisov [mailto:nborisov@xxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2018 4:15 PM
> To: Gu, Jinxiang/顾 金香 <gujx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: quwenruo.btrfs@xxxxxxx; wen.xu@xxxxxxxxxx; xuwen.sjtu@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] btrfs: Add chunk type check in read a chunk
> 
> 
> 
> On  3.07.2018 09:20, Gu Jinxiang wrote:
> > Reported in https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199839,
> > which has a invalid chunk, not return error opportunlly.
> >
> > Add chunk type check in btrfs_check_chunk_valid,
> > to make error be returned in advance.
> >
> > Reported-by: Xu Wen <wen.xu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Gu Jinxiang <gujx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > changelog:
> > v2:
> > deal with comment by Qu, add precise check for chunk type.
> >
> >  fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> > index e034ad9e23b4..fcdb1a75d653 100644
> > --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> > +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> > @@ -6401,6 +6401,8 @@ static int btrfs_check_chunk_valid(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> >  	u16 num_stripes;
> >  	u16 sub_stripes;
> >  	u64 type;
> > +	u64 features;
> > +	int mixed = 0;
> >
> >  	length = btrfs_chunk_length(leaf, chunk);
> >  	stripe_len = btrfs_chunk_stripe_len(leaf, chunk);
> > @@ -6439,6 +6441,31 @@ static int btrfs_check_chunk_valid(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> >  			  btrfs_chunk_type(leaf, chunk));
> >  		return -EIO;
> >  	}
> > +
> > +	if (!(type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK)) {
> > +		btrfs_err(fs_info, "missing chunk type flag: %llu", type);
> > +		return -EIO;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if ((type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM) &&
> > +	(type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA | BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA))) {
> > +		btrfs_err(fs_info, "duplicate chunk type flag: %llu", type);
> 
> This is not really a duplicate chunk type flag but instead an invalid
> combination. SYSTEM is always a dedicated chunk, rephrase the error
> message.

Yes. This message should be updated.
But [PATCH 1/5] btrfs: tree-checker: Verify block_group_item sent by Qu, checks the chunk type
in tree checker, which be called when read a bio. So this patch should not be merged.

> 
> > +		return -EIO;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	features = btrfs_super_incompat_flags(fs_info->super_copy);
> > +	if (features & BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_MIXED_GROUPS)
> > +		mixed = 1;
> > +
> > +	if (!mixed) {
> > +		if (type &
> > +		(BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA)) {
> > +			btrfs_err(fs_info,
> > +			"mixed chunk type flag in non-mixed mode: %llu", type);
> > +			return -EIO;
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	if ((type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10 && sub_stripes != 2) ||
> >  	    (type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1 && num_stripes < 1) ||
> >  	    (type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5 && num_stripes < 2) ||
> >
> 



��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{����n�r������&��z�ޗ�zf���h���~����������_��+v���)ߣ�

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux