On 07/03/2018 07:42 PM, David Disseldorp wrote:
The experimental flag is already carried in the manpage, but was removed
from the btrfs check usage message as part of refactoring via
87c1bd13c1fca430c3dbf0da62e9aa33bde609c8. Add it back.
Signed-off-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@xxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
check/main.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/check/main.c b/check/main.c
index 3190b5d4..9aca0c09 100644
--- a/check/main.c
+++ b/check/main.c
@@ -9386,7 +9386,7 @@ const char * const cmd_check_usage[] = {
" original - read inodes and extents to memory (requires",
" more memory, does less IO)",
" lowmem - try to use less memory but read blocks again",
- " when needed",
+ " when needed (experimental)",
"--check-data-csum verify checksums of data blocks",
"-Q|--qgroup-report print a report on qgroup consistency",
"-E|--subvol-extents <subvolid>",
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
