Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix mount failure when qgroup rescan is in progress

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 27.06.2018 02:43, fdmanana@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@xxxxxxxx>
> 
> If a power failure happens while the qgroup rescan kthread is running,
> the next mount operation will always fail. This is because of a recent
> regression that makes qgroup_rescan_init() incorrectly return -EINVAL
> when we are mounting the filesystem (through btrfs_read_qgroup_config()).
> This causes the -EINVAL error to be returned regardless of any qgroup
> flags being set instead of returning the error only when neither of
> the flags BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_RESCAN nor BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_ON
> are set.
> 
> A test case for fstests follows up soon.
> 
> Fixes: 9593bf49675e ("btrfs: qgroup: show more meaningful qgroup_rescan_init error message")
> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/qgroup.c | 13 ++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
> index 1874a6d2e6f5..d4171de93087 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
> @@ -2784,13 +2784,20 @@ qgroup_rescan_init(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 progress_objectid,
>  
>  	if (!init_flags) {
>  		/* we're resuming qgroup rescan at mount time */
> -		if (!(fs_info->qgroup_flags & BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_RESCAN))
> +		if (!(fs_info->qgroup_flags &
> +		      BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_RESCAN)) {
>  			btrfs_warn(fs_info,
>  			"qgroup rescan init failed, qgroup is not enabled");
> -		else if (!(fs_info->qgroup_flags & BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_ON))
> +			ret = -EINVAL;
> +		} else if (!(fs_info->qgroup_flags &
> +			     BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_ON)) {
>  			btrfs_warn(fs_info,
>  			"qgroup rescan init failed, qgroup rescan is not queued");
> -		return -EINVAL;
> +			ret = -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;


How is this patch functionally different than the old code. In both
cases if either of those 2 is not set a warn is printed and -EINVAL is
returned?

>  	}
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock);
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux