waxhead wrote 24.6.2018 klo 1.01:
Nikolay Borisov wrote:
On 22.06.2018 02:13, waxhead wrote:
According to this:
https://stratis-storage.github.io/StratisSoftwareDesign.pdf
Page 4 , section 1.2
It claims that BTRFS still have significant technical issues that may
never be resolved.
Could someone shed some light on exactly what these technical issues
might be?! What are BTRFS biggest technical problems?
That's a question that needs to be directed at the author of the statement.
I think not, and here's why: I am asking the BTRFS developers a general
question , with some basis as to why I became curious. The question is
simply what (if any) are the biggest technical issues in BTRFS because one
must expect that if anyone is going to give me a credible answer it must be
the people that hack on BTRFS and understand what they are working on and
not the stratis guys. It would surprise me if they knew better than the
BTRFS devs.
I think the problem with that question is that it is too general. Duncan's
post already highlights several things that could be a significant problem
for some user while being non-issue for most. Without more specific problem
description, best you can hope for is speculation on things that Btrfs
currently does badly.
-Jukka Larja
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
