On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 4:36 PM, David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 04:34:33PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> The structure already has 64-bit fields for the timestamps, but >> calling get_seconds() may truncate and risk overflow on 32-bit >> architectures. >> >> This changes the dev-replace code to use ktime_get_real_seconds() >> instead, which always returns 64-bit timestamps. >> >> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> > > Thanks but there's a patch already fixng that, sent a few days ago > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10473195/ > > and added to patch queue for the next dev cycle as it does not appear to > urgent for 4.18. Ok, sounds good. I had missed that Allen has independently sent out some of the same patches that I created in the last weeks. Allen, do you have more patches pending? I have sent out most of what I did (around 80 patches I think), with just ext4, ceph, nfs and xfs pending at the moment. It seems we also sent identical patches for procfs and I have something pending for ceph that duplicates another patch you did. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
