On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 09:05:59PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > > New code needs to be tested, documented and maintained, that's the cost > > I find too high for something that's convenience for people who are used > > to some shell builtins. > > The biggest problem is, the behavior isn't even consistent across > btrfs-progs. > mkfs.btrfs accept such out-of-order parameters while btrfs not. > > And most common tools, like commands provided by coretutil, they don't > care about the order. > The only daily exception is 'scp', which I found it pretty unhandy. > > And just as Paul and Hugo, I think there are quite some users preferring > out-of-order parameter/options. Because of the feedback and interest of the relaxed mixed option/argument syntax, I don't object anymore. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
