[BUG]
Under certain KVM load and LTP tests, we are possible to hit the
following calltrace if quota is enabled:
------
BTRFS critical (device vda2): unable to find logical 8820195328 length 4096
BTRFS critical (device vda2): unable to find logical 8820195328 length 4096
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 49 at ../block/blk-core.c:172 blk_status_to_errno+0x1a/0x30
CPU: 0 PID: 49 Comm: kworker/u2:1 Not tainted 4.12.14-15-default #1 SLE15 (unreleased)
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.0.0-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
Workqueue: btrfs-endio-write btrfs_endio_write_helper [btrfs]
task: ffff9f827b340bc0 task.stack: ffffb4f8c0304000
RIP: 0010:blk_status_to_errno+0x1a/0x30
Call Trace:
submit_extent_page+0x191/0x270 [btrfs]
? btrfs_create_repair_bio+0x130/0x130 [btrfs]
__do_readpage+0x2d2/0x810 [btrfs]
? btrfs_create_repair_bio+0x130/0x130 [btrfs]
? run_one_async_done+0xc0/0xc0 [btrfs]
__extent_read_full_page+0xe7/0x100 [btrfs]
? run_one_async_done+0xc0/0xc0 [btrfs]
read_extent_buffer_pages+0x1ab/0x2d0 [btrfs]
? run_one_async_done+0xc0/0xc0 [btrfs]
btree_read_extent_buffer_pages+0x94/0xf0 [btrfs]
read_tree_block+0x31/0x60 [btrfs]
read_block_for_search.isra.35+0xf0/0x2e0 [btrfs]
btrfs_search_slot+0x46b/0xa00 [btrfs]
? kmem_cache_alloc+0x1a8/0x510
? btrfs_get_token_32+0x5b/0x120 [btrfs]
find_parent_nodes+0x11d/0xeb0 [btrfs]
? leaf_space_used+0xb8/0xd0 [btrfs]
? btrfs_leaf_free_space+0x49/0x90 [btrfs]
? btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0x93/0x100 [btrfs]
btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0x93/0x100 [btrfs]
btrfs_find_all_roots+0x45/0x60 [btrfs]
btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post+0x20/0x40 [btrfs]
btrfs_add_delayed_data_ref+0x1a3/0x1d0 [btrfs]
btrfs_alloc_reserved_file_extent+0x38/0x40 [btrfs]
insert_reserved_file_extent.constprop.71+0x289/0x2e0 [btrfs]
btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x2f4/0x7f0 [btrfs]
? pick_next_task_fair+0x2cd/0x530
? __switch_to+0x92/0x4b0
btrfs_worker_helper+0x81/0x300 [btrfs]
process_one_work+0x1da/0x3f0
worker_thread+0x2b/0x3f0
? process_one_work+0x3f0/0x3f0
kthread+0x11a/0x130
? kthread_create_on_node+0x40/0x40
ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
Code: 00 00 5b c3 0f 1f 00 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 40 80 ff 0c 40 0f b6 c7 77 0b 48 c1 e0 04 8b 80 00 bf c8 bd c3 <0f> 0b b8 fb ff ff ff c3 0f 1f 40 00 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00
---[ end trace f079fb809e7a862b ]---
BTRFS critical (device vda2): unable to find logical 8820195328 length 16384
BTRFS: error (device vda2) in btrfs_finish_ordered_io:3023: errno=-5 IO failure
BTRFS info (device vda2): forced readonly
BTRFS error (device vda2): pending csums is 2887680
------
[CAUSE]
It's caused by race with block group auto removal like the following
case:
- There is a meta block group X, which has only one tree block
The tree block belongs to fs tree 257.
- In current transaction, some operation modified fs tree 257
The tree block get CoWed, so the block group X is empty, and marked as
unused, queued to be deleted.
- Some workload (like fsync) wakes up cleaner_kthread()
Which will call btrfs_deleted_unused_bgs() to remove unused block
groups.
So block group X along its chunk map get removed.
- Some delalloc work finished for fs tree 257
Quota needs to get the original reference of the extent, which will
reads tree blocks of commit root of 257.
Then since the chunk map get removed, above warning get triggered.
[FIX]
Just teach btrfs_delete_unused_bgs() to skip block group who still has
pinned bytes.
However there is a minor side effect, since currently we only queue
empty blocks at update_block_group(), and such empty block group with
pinned bytes won't go through update_block_group() again, such block
group won't be removed, until it get new extent allocated and removed.
But please note that, there are more problems related to extent
allocator with block group auto removal.
Even a block group is marked unused, extent allocator can still allocate
new extents from unused block group.
Thus delaying block group to next transaction won't work.
(Extents get allocated in current transaction, and removed again in next
transaction).
So the root fix need to co-operate with extent allocator.
But current fix should be enough for this particular bug.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@xxxxxxxx>
---
changelog:
v2:
Commit message update, to better indicate how pinned byte is used in
btrfs and why it's related to quota.
v3:
Commit message update, further explaining the bug with an example.
And added the side effect of the fix, and possible further fix.
---
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index f190023386a9..7d14c4ca8232 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -10675,7 +10675,7 @@ void btrfs_delete_unused_bgs(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
/* Don't want to race with allocators so take the groups_sem */
down_write(&space_info->groups_sem);
spin_lock(&block_group->lock);
- if (block_group->reserved ||
+ if (block_group->reserved || block_group->pinned ||
btrfs_block_group_used(&block_group->item) ||
block_group->ro ||
list_is_singular(&block_group->list)) {
--
2.17.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
