Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: checking for NULL instead of IS_ERR

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: checking for NULL instead of IS_ERR
From: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 11:19:09 +0200
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>, kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <d51ba220-ca4c-c79e-51c9-1f3a21ecbde6@jp.fujitsu.com>
Mail-followup-to: dsterba@xxxxxxx, Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>, kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20180531062111.374pq6lxrmdffun6@kili.mountain> <d51ba220-ca4c-c79e-51c9-1f3a21ecbde6@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reply-to: dsterba@xxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12)

On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 03:41:41PM +0900, Misono Tomohiro wrote:
> David, could you apply this on top of my v7 patch in for-next tree?

Done.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

References:
- [PATCH] Btrfs: checking for NULL instead of IS_ERR
  - From: Dan Carpenter
- Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: checking for NULL instead of IS_ERR
  - From: Misono Tomohiro

Prev by Date: [PATCH RFC] btrfs: scrub: Don't use inode pages for device replace
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: Refactor running of delayed inode items during transaction commit
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: checking for NULL instead of IS_ERR
Next by thread: [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: fix parent in memory total_devices after seed delete
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux