On 30.05.2018 09:49, Su Yue wrote:
> btrfs_alloc_path() may fail due to no enough memory,
> so let the function return -ENOMEM instead of -ENOENT is better.
>
> Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changelog:
> v2:
> Add commit message to describe the patch. Thanks Nikolay.
>
> fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> index 44093f92a532..99df6199dffc 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> @@ -3311,7 +3311,7 @@ int btrfs_cross_ref_exist(struct btrfs_root *root, u64 objectid, u64 offset,
>
> path = btrfs_alloc_path();
> if (!path)
> - return -ENOENT;
> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> do {
> ret = check_committed_ref(root, path, objectid,
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
