Re: off-by-one uncompressed invalid ram_bytes corruptions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 1:49 AM, Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> And btrfs check doesn't report the same problem as the default original
> mode doesn't have such check.
>
> Please also post the result of "btrfs check --mode=lowmem /dev/sda1"

Are you saying "--mode=lowmem" does more checks than without it?  "man
btrfs check" says it's experimental and the difference is just
original is unoptimized regarding memory consumption and can run out
of memory, and low memory addresses this with increased IO cost from
re-reading blocks increasing run time.  It doesn't indicate lowmem is
a better check.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux