On 15.05.2018 20:52, Liu Bo wrote:
> In read_block_for_search(), it's straightforward to use
> extent_buffer_uptodate() instead since 0 is passed as parent transid to
"instead of the more heavyweight btrfs_buffer_update"
> btrfs_buffer_uptodate(), which means the check for parent transid is not
> needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Codewise LGTM:
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
> index 9fa3d77c98d4..a96d308c51b8 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
> @@ -2445,7 +2445,7 @@ noinline void btrfs_unlock_up_safe(struct btrfs_path *path, int level)
> * and give up so that our caller doesn't loop forever
> * on our EAGAINs.
> */
> - if (!btrfs_buffer_uptodate(tmp, 0, 0))
> + if (!extent_buffer_uptodate(tmp))
> ret = -EIO;
> free_extent_buffer(tmp);
> } else {
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
