On 26.04.2018 22:23, jeffm@xxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@xxxxxxxx> > > btrfs_init_work clears the work struct except for ->wq, so the memset > before calling btrfs_init_work in qgroup_rescan_init is unnecessary. > > We'll also initialize ->wq in btrfs_init_work so that it's obvious. > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@xxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@xxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/btrfs/async-thread.c | 1 + > fs/btrfs/qgroup.c | 2 -- > 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c > index d5540749f0e5..c614fb7b9b9d 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c > @@ -354,6 +354,7 @@ void btrfs_init_work(struct btrfs_work *work, btrfs_work_func_t uniq_func, > INIT_WORK(&work->normal_work, uniq_func); > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&work->ordered_list); > work->flags = 0; > + work->wq = NULL; > } > > static inline void __btrfs_queue_work(struct __btrfs_workqueue *wq, > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c > index be491b6c020a..8de423a0c7e3 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c > @@ -2740,8 +2740,6 @@ qgroup_rescan_init(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 progress_objectid, > spin_unlock(&fs_info->qgroup_lock); > mutex_unlock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock); > > - memset(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_work, 0, > - sizeof(fs_info->qgroup_rescan_work)); > btrfs_init_work(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_work, > btrfs_qgroup_rescan_helper, > btrfs_qgroup_rescan_worker, NULL, NULL); > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
