2018-04-25 13:39 GMT+02:00 Austin S. Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@xxxxxxxxx>: > Define 'stable'. Something ready for production use like ext or xfs with no critical bugs or with easy data loss. > If you just want 'safe for critical data', it's mostly there already > provided that your admins and operators are careful. Assuming you avoid > qgroups and parity raid, don't run the filesystem near full all the time, > and keep an eye on the chunk allocations (which is easy to automate with > newer kernels), you will generally be fine. We've been using it in > production where I work for a couple of years now, with the only issues > we've encountered arising from the fact that we're stuck using an older > kernel which doesn't automatically deallocate empty chunks. For me, RAID56 is mandatory. Any ETA for a stable RAID56 ? Is something we should expect this year, next year, next 10 years, .... ? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
