Re: [PATCH v2 12/16] btrfs: track running balance in a simpler way

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 04/20/2018 12:33 AM, David Sterba wrote:
Currently fs_info::balance_running is 0 or 1 and does not use the
semantics of atomics. The pause and cancel check for 0, that can happen
only after __btrfs_balance exits for whatever reason.

Parallel calls to balance ioctl may enter btrfs_ioctl_balance multiple
times but will block on the balance_mutex that protects the
fs_info::flags bit.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
---
  fs/btrfs/ctree.h   |  6 +++++-
  fs/btrfs/disk-io.c |  1 -
  fs/btrfs/ioctl.c   |  6 +++---
  fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
  4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
index 011cb9a8a967..fda94a264eb7 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
@@ -726,6 +726,11 @@ struct btrfs_delayed_root;
   * (device replace, resize, device add/delete, balance)
   */
  #define BTRFS_FS_EXCL_OP			16
+/*
+ * Indicate that balance has been set up from the ioctl and is in the main
+ * phase. The fs_info::balance_ctl is initialized.
+ */
+#define BTRFS_FS_BALANCE_RUNNING		17


 Change looks good to me as such and its a good idea to drop
   fs_info::balance_running;

 However instead of making BTRFS_FS_BALANCE_RUNNING part of
   btrfs_fs_info::flags
 pls make it part of
   btrfs_balance_control::flags

 Because:
 We already have BTRFS_BALANCE_RESUME there.
 And at fs_info level BTRFS_FS_EXCL_OP tells someone excl is running.
 And if its a balance (either in running or implicit-paused state)
 then btrfs_fs_info::balance_ctl is not NULL.

Thanks, Anand

struct btrfs_fs_info {
  	u8 fsid[BTRFS_FSID_SIZE];
@@ -991,7 +996,6 @@ struct btrfs_fs_info {
  	/* restriper state */
  	spinlock_t balance_lock;
  	struct mutex balance_mutex;
-	atomic_t balance_running;
  	atomic_t balance_pause_req;
  	atomic_t balance_cancel_req;
  	struct btrfs_balance_control *balance_ctl;
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
index c0482ecea11f..b62559dfb053 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
@@ -2168,7 +2168,6 @@ static void btrfs_init_balance(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
  {
  	spin_lock_init(&fs_info->balance_lock);
  	mutex_init(&fs_info->balance_mutex);
-	atomic_set(&fs_info->balance_running, 0);
  	atomic_set(&fs_info->balance_pause_req, 0);
  	atomic_set(&fs_info->balance_cancel_req, 0);
  	fs_info->balance_ctl = NULL;
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
index 7c99f74c200e..3dfd5ab2807b 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
@@ -4506,7 +4506,7 @@ void update_ioctl_balance_args(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, int lock,
bargs->flags = bctl->flags; - if (atomic_read(&fs_info->balance_running))
+	if (test_bit(BTRFS_FS_BALANCE_RUNNING, &fs_info->flags))
  		bargs->state |= BTRFS_BALANCE_STATE_RUNNING;
  	if (atomic_read(&fs_info->balance_pause_req))
  		bargs->state |= BTRFS_BALANCE_STATE_PAUSE_REQ;
@@ -4558,7 +4558,7 @@ static long btrfs_ioctl_balance(struct file *file, void __user *arg)
  	mutex_lock(&fs_info->balance_mutex);
  	if (fs_info->balance_ctl) {
  		/* this is either (2) or (3) */
-		if (!atomic_read(&fs_info->balance_running)) {
+		if (!test_bit(BTRFS_FS_BALANCE_RUNNING, &fs_info->flags)) {
  			mutex_unlock(&fs_info->balance_mutex);
  			/*
  			 * Lock released to allow other waiters to continue,
@@ -4567,7 +4567,7 @@ static long btrfs_ioctl_balance(struct file *file, void __user *arg)
  			mutex_lock(&fs_info->balance_mutex);
if (fs_info->balance_ctl &&
-			    !atomic_read(&fs_info->balance_running)) {
+			    !test_bit(BTRFS_FS_BALANCE_RUNNING, &fs_info->flags)) {
  				/* this is (3) */
  				need_unlock = false;
  				goto locked;
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index e95cc2f09fdd..a766d2f988c1 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -3886,13 +3886,14 @@ int btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_balance_control *bctl,
  		spin_unlock(&fs_info->balance_lock);
  	}
- atomic_inc(&fs_info->balance_running);
+	ASSERT(!test_bit(BTRFS_FS_BALANCE_RUNNING, &fs_info->flags));
+	set_bit(BTRFS_FS_BALANCE_RUNNING, &fs_info->flags);
  	mutex_unlock(&fs_info->balance_mutex);
ret = __btrfs_balance(fs_info); mutex_lock(&fs_info->balance_mutex);
-	atomic_dec(&fs_info->balance_running);
+	clear_bit(BTRFS_FS_BALANCE_RUNNING, &fs_info->flags);
if (bargs) {
  		memset(bargs, 0, sizeof(*bargs));
@@ -4031,16 +4032,16 @@ int btrfs_pause_balance(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
  		return -ENOTCONN;
  	}
- if (atomic_read(&fs_info->balance_running)) {
+	if (test_bit(BTRFS_FS_BALANCE_RUNNING, &fs_info->flags)) {
  		atomic_inc(&fs_info->balance_pause_req);
  		mutex_unlock(&fs_info->balance_mutex);
wait_event(fs_info->balance_wait_q,
-			   atomic_read(&fs_info->balance_running) == 0);
+			   !test_bit(BTRFS_FS_BALANCE_RUNNING, &fs_info->flags));
mutex_lock(&fs_info->balance_mutex);
  		/* we are good with balance_ctl ripped off from under us */
-		BUG_ON(atomic_read(&fs_info->balance_running));
+		BUG_ON(test_bit(BTRFS_FS_BALANCE_RUNNING, &fs_info->flags));
  		atomic_dec(&fs_info->balance_pause_req);
  	} else {
  		ret = -ENOTCONN;
@@ -4066,10 +4067,10 @@ int btrfs_cancel_balance(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
  	 * if we are running just wait and return, balance item is
  	 * deleted in btrfs_balance in this case
  	 */
-	if (atomic_read(&fs_info->balance_running)) {
+	if (test_bit(BTRFS_FS_BALANCE_RUNNING, &fs_info->flags)) {
  		mutex_unlock(&fs_info->balance_mutex);
  		wait_event(fs_info->balance_wait_q,
-			   atomic_read(&fs_info->balance_running) == 0);
+			   !test_bit(BTRFS_FS_BALANCE_RUNNING, &fs_info->flags));
  		mutex_lock(&fs_info->balance_mutex);
  	} else {
  		mutex_unlock(&fs_info->balance_mutex);
@@ -4085,7 +4086,8 @@ int btrfs_cancel_balance(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
  		}
  	}
- BUG_ON(fs_info->balance_ctl || atomic_read(&fs_info->balance_running));
+	BUG_ON(fs_info->balance_ctl ||
+		test_bit(BTRFS_FS_BALANCE_RUNNING, &fs_info->flags));
  	atomic_dec(&fs_info->balance_cancel_req);
  	mutex_unlock(&fs_info->balance_mutex);
  	return 0;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux