Looks good, some minor comments below. I'm wondering how to test that.
We'd have to inject either the corruption or to provide a way to
forcibly fail the test. For the latter a debugfs should do, I'll send
something for comments.
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 05:38:16PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> @@ -3563,6 +3565,12 @@ int write_all_supers(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, int max_mirrors)
> sb = fs_info->super_for_commit;
> dev_item = &sb->dev_item;
>
> + if (btrfs_check_super_valid(fs_info, sb, -1)) {
A comment that this is skipping the bytenr check would be good.
> + btrfs_err(fs_info,
> + "superblock corruption detected before transaction commitment");
commit
> + return -EUCLEAN;
> + }
> +
> mutex_lock(&fs_info->fs_devices->device_list_mutex);
> head = &fs_info->fs_devices->devices;
> max_errors = btrfs_super_num_devices(fs_info->super_copy) - 1;
> @@ -3974,9 +3982,18 @@ int btrfs_read_buffer(struct extent_buffer *buf, u64 parent_transid, int level,
> level, first_key);
> }
>
> -static int btrfs_check_super_valid(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
> +/*
> + * Check the validation of btrfs super block.
> + *
> + * @sb: super block to check
> + * @super_mirror: the super block number to check its bytenr.
> + * 0 means the primary (1st) sb, 1 and 2 means 2nd and
> + * 3rd backup sb, while -1 means to skip bytenr check.
> + */
> +static int btrfs_check_super_valid(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> + struct btrfs_super_block *sb,
> + int super_mirror)
> {
> - struct btrfs_super_block *sb = fs_info->super_copy;
> u64 nodesize = btrfs_super_nodesize(sb);
> u64 sectorsize = btrfs_super_sectorsize(sb);
> int ret = 0;
> @@ -4019,7 +4036,7 @@ static int btrfs_check_super_valid(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
> * Check sectorsize and nodesize first, other check will need it.
> * Check all possible sectorsize(4K, 8K, 16K, 32K, 64K) here.
> */
> - if (!is_power_of_2(sectorsize) || sectorsize < 4096 ||
> + if (!is_power_of_2(sectorsize) || sectorsize < SZ_4K ||
No unrelated changes please. There are some remaining raw values, send a
separate patch if you want to convert them.
> sectorsize > BTRFS_MAX_METADATA_BLOCKSIZE) {
> btrfs_err(fs_info, "invalid sectorsize %llu", sectorsize);
> ret = -EINVAL;
> @@ -4088,9 +4105,10 @@ static int btrfs_check_super_valid(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
> ret = -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - if (btrfs_super_bytenr(sb) != BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET) {
> - btrfs_err(fs_info, "super offset mismatch %llu != %u",
> - btrfs_super_bytenr(sb), BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET);
> + if (super_mirror >= 0 && btrfs_super_bytenr(sb) !=
> + btrfs_sb_offset(super_mirror)) {
> + btrfs_err(fs_info, "super offset mismatch %llu != %llu",
> + btrfs_super_bytenr(sb), btrfs_sb_offset(super_mirror));
> ret = -EINVAL;
> }
>
> --
> 2.17.0
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
