On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 05:03:15PM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote: > > > > On 2018年04月04日 16:53, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > > > On 3.04.2018 10:30, Qu Wenruo wrote: > > >> I didn't see this patch merged in your misc-next branch but only the > > >> remaining patches. > > >> > > >> However without this patch, btrfs qgroup reserved space will get > > >> obviously increased as prealloc metadata reserved space is never freed > > >> until inode reserved space is freed. > > >> > > >> This would cause a lot of qgroup related test cases to fail. > > >> > > >> Would you please merge this patch with all qgroup patchset? > > > > > > I'm seeing btrfs/022 and btrfs/099 fail as of today's misc-next. Both > > > are qgroup related tests. > > > > Exactly. > > > > Wondering why this patch is left. > I'm also seeing several qgroups xfstests failures on Linus' master > branch. Dave? Hm, dunno where the last patch got lost. The intention whas to merge the whole series, I'll add the patch to 2nd pull. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
