On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 05:42:14PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
>
>
> > @@ -3926,11 +3925,11 @@ int btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_balance_control *bctl,
> > return ret;
> > out:
> > if (bctl->flags & BTRFS_BALANCE_RESUME)
> > - __cancel_balance(fs_info);
> > - else {
> > + reset_balance_state(fs_info);
>
> reset_balance_state() is something unrelated. More over compile fails
> at this patch.
>
> ----
> fs/btrfs/volumes.c: In function ‘btrfs_balance’:
> fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3928:3: error: implicit declaration of function
> ‘reset_balance_state’; did you mean ‘insert_balance_item’?
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> reset_balance_state(fs_info);
Right, it looks like a misapplied fixup for patch "btrfs: cleanup
helpers that reset balance state" that's farther in the series. Will
fix.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
