On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 09:45:02AM -0400, Zygo Blaxell wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 04:30:17PM +0900, Misono, Tomohiro wrote: > > This is a part of RFC I sent last December[1] whose aim is to improve normal users' usability. > > The remaining works of RFC are: > > - Allow "sub delete" for empty subvolume > > I don't mean to scope creep on you, but I have a couple of wishes related > to this topic: > > - allow "rmdir" to remove an empty subvolume, i.e. when a subvolume is Ignore me... I just noticed your patch to do exactly this. ;) > detected in rmdir, try switching to subvol delete before returning > an error. This lets admin tools that are not btrfs-aware do 'rm > -fr' on a user directory when it contains a subvolume. Legacy admin > tools (or legacy tools in general) can't remove a subvol, and there > is no solution for environments where we can't just fire users who > create them. > > - mount option to restrict "sub create" and "sub snapshot" to root only. > If we get "rmdir" working then this is significantly less important. > > > - Allow "qgroup show" to check quota limit > > > > [1] https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg70991.html >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
