[PATCH 3/6] btrfs: update barrier in should_cow_block

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Once there was a simple int force_cow that was used with the plain
barriers, and then converted to a bit, so we should use the appropriate
barrier helper.

Other variables in the complex if condition do not depend on a barrier,
so we should be fine in case the atomic barrier becomes a no-op.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
index b88a79e69ddf..4c75df2eea2e 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
@@ -1502,8 +1502,8 @@ static inline int should_cow_block(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 	if (btrfs_is_testing(root->fs_info))
 		return 0;
 
-	/* ensure we can see the force_cow */
-	smp_rmb();
+	/* Ensure we can see the FORCE_COW bit */
+	smp_mb__before_atomic();
 
 	/*
 	 * We do not need to cow a block if
-- 
2.16.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux