On 2018年03月19日 19:15, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > > > On 19.03.2018 12:54, Nikolay Borisov wrote: >> >> >> On 19.03.2018 12:50, Qu Wenruo wrote: >>> What about this value? >>> 18446744073709551607 >>> >>> It's data reloc tree objectid. >>> And it's pretty long since it's -9ULL. >>> >>> At least this makes 2 objectid more readable. >> >> Fair enough. >> > > Looking a bit more I wonder if we should use the same print_objectid > function for the "owner" field of a leaf block. > > For the data reloc tree we currently get: > > leaf 30490624 items 2 free space 16061 generation 4 owner > 18446744073709551607 > > > Or for the leaf belonging to the first fs tree (5): > leaf 30883840 items 11 free space 15354 generation 10 owner 5 Good idea! Looks pretty nice to me. Thanks, Qu > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
