On 19.03.2018 12:54, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > > > On 19.03.2018 12:50, Qu Wenruo wrote: >> What about this value? >> 18446744073709551607 >> >> It's data reloc tree objectid. >> And it's pretty long since it's -9ULL. >> >> At least this makes 2 objectid more readable. > > Fair enough. > Looking a bit more I wonder if we should use the same print_objectid function for the "owner" field of a leaf block. For the data reloc tree we currently get: leaf 30490624 items 2 free space 16061 generation 4 owner 18446744073709551607 Or for the leaf belonging to the first fs tree (5): leaf 30883840 items 11 free space 15354 generation 10 owner 5 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
