Re: [PATCH 5/7] btrfs-progs: volumes: Allow find_free_dev_extent() to return maximum hole size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On  2.02.2018 10:19, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Just as kernel find_free_dev_extent(), allow it to return maximum hole
> size for us to build device list for later chunk allocator rework.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  volumes.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/volumes.c b/volumes.c
> index b47ff1f392b5..f4009ffa7c9e 100644
> --- a/volumes.c
> +++ b/volumes.c
> @@ -516,10 +516,10 @@ out:
>  }
>  
>  static int find_free_dev_extent(struct btrfs_device *device, u64 num_bytes,
> -				u64 *start)
> +				u64 *start, u64 *len)
>  {
>  	/* FIXME use last free of some kind */
> -	return find_free_dev_extent_start(device, num_bytes, 0, start, NULL);
> +	return find_free_dev_extent_start(device, num_bytes, 0, start, len);

Why do we need the free_dev_extent() wrapper over free_dev_extent_start
at all?
>  }
>  
>  static int btrfs_alloc_dev_extent(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> @@ -543,7 +543,7 @@ static int btrfs_alloc_dev_extent(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>  	 * is responsible to make sure it's free.
>  	 */
>  	if (!convert) {
> -		ret = find_free_dev_extent(device, num_bytes, start);
> +		ret = find_free_dev_extent(device, num_bytes, start, NULL);
>  		if (ret)
>  			goto err;
>  	}
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux