On 2018年02月02日 00:05, David Sterba wrote: > On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 02:45:38PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: >> As usual, the main part is over 500K so the biggest patch won't reach >> mail list. >> Please fetch the whole branch from github: >> https://github.com/adam900710/btrfs-progs/tree/split_check > > Thanks, patches added to devel, with some more adjustments. > >> Despite the update, a new patch is introduced, to address the tons of >> BORING errors and warning from checkpatch.pl. > > The checkpatch script can report lots of things to fix, but please note > that not all of them match the style we use. I've updated the patch 3/3 > and undone some of the line splits, because it's the example where the > code looks worse after fixing. Yep, some 81/82 chars modification is not that elegant. > > We'd probably have to host our modified version of checkpatch so the > warnings don't get reported repeatedly. That would be the best case, I could take some spare time to port checkpatch to btrfs-progs. Thanks, Qu > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
