On 2018年01月30日 16:16, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>
>
> On 30.01.2018 09:40, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>> Function __get_raid_index() is used to convert block group flags into
>> raid index, which can be used to get various info directly from
>> btrfs_raid_array[].
>>
>> Refactor this function a little:
>>
>> 1) Rename to btrfs_bg_flags_to_raid_index()
>> Double underline prefix is normally for internal functions, while the
>> function is used by both extent-tree and volumes.
>>
>> Although the name is a little longer, but it should explain its usage
>> quite well.
>>
>> 2) Move it to volumes.h and make it static inline
>> Just several if-else branches, really no need to define it as a normal
>> function.
>>
>> This also makes later code re-use between kernel and btrfs-progs
>> easier.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@xxxxxxxx>
>
> Generally this looks good so you can add my :
>
> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@xxxxxxxx>
>
> However I wonder whether we should strive to add proper kernel docs to
> function whenever we can (without going out of the way to do so).
Kernel docs here seems a little over killed here.
IMHO kernel docs are used for things like API, state machine or design
overview.
Here the raid type index is mostly internal used as a quicker and
unified way to access btrfs_raid_array[].
Extra comment (maybe 1 or 2 lines) will be added in next version about
the usage, and hopes it should work.
> I.e
> you are modifying the function now so might as well add them and
> explicitly state it's used to convert blockgroup flags to raid levels.
> The end goal is to make it easier for people who are looking for the
> first time at the source to have easier time.
Yep, making the source easier to read is always good.
Thanks,
Qu
>
>> ---
>> fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 26 ++++----------------------
>> fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 2 +-
>> fs/btrfs/volumes.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
>> index 2f4328511ac8..e9c31b567a9c 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
>> @@ -7346,27 +7346,9 @@ wait_block_group_cache_done(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache)
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> -int __get_raid_index(u64 flags)
>> -{
>> - if (flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10)
>> - return BTRFS_RAID_RAID10;
>> - else if (flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1)
>> - return BTRFS_RAID_RAID1;
>> - else if (flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP)
>> - return BTRFS_RAID_DUP;
>> - else if (flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID0)
>> - return BTRFS_RAID_RAID0;
>> - else if (flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5)
>> - return BTRFS_RAID_RAID5;
>> - else if (flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6)
>> - return BTRFS_RAID_RAID6;
>> -
>> - return BTRFS_RAID_SINGLE; /* BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SINGLE */
>> -}
>> -
>> int get_block_group_index(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache)
>> {
>> - return __get_raid_index(cache->flags);
>> + return btrfs_bg_flags_to_raid_index(cache->flags);
>> }
>>
>> static const char *btrfs_raid_type_names[BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES] = {
>> @@ -7483,7 +7465,7 @@ static noinline int find_free_extent(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>> u64 empty_cluster = 0;
>> struct btrfs_space_info *space_info;
>> int loop = 0;
>> - int index = __get_raid_index(flags);
>> + int index = btrfs_bg_flags_to_raid_index(flags);
>> bool failed_cluster_refill = false;
>> bool failed_alloc = false;
>> bool use_cluster = true;
>> @@ -7579,7 +7561,7 @@ static noinline int find_free_extent(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>> }
>> search:
>> have_caching_bg = false;
>> - if (index == 0 || index == __get_raid_index(flags))
>> + if (index == 0 || index == btrfs_bg_flags_to_raid_index(flags))
>> full_search = true;
>> down_read(&space_info->groups_sem);
>> list_for_each_entry(block_group, &space_info->block_groups[index],
>> @@ -9643,7 +9625,7 @@ int btrfs_can_relocate(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 bytenr)
>> */
>> target = get_restripe_target(fs_info, block_group->flags);
>> if (target) {
>> - index = __get_raid_index(extended_to_chunk(target));
>> + index = btrfs_bg_flags_to_raid_index(extended_to_chunk(target));
>> } else {
>> /*
>> * this is just a balance, so if we were marked as full
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
>> index a25684287501..d818b1f9c625 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
>> @@ -4625,7 +4625,7 @@ static int __btrfs_alloc_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>> if (list_empty(&fs_devices->alloc_list))
>> return -ENOSPC;
>>
>> - index = __get_raid_index(type);
>> + index = btrfs_bg_flags_to_raid_index(type);
>>
>> sub_stripes = btrfs_raid_array[index].sub_stripes;
>> dev_stripes = btrfs_raid_array[index].dev_stripes;
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
>> index ff15208344a7..413e07e44b42 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
>> @@ -533,6 +533,24 @@ static inline void btrfs_dev_stat_reset(struct btrfs_device *dev,
>> btrfs_dev_stat_set(dev, index, 0);
>> }
>>
>> +static inline enum btrfs_raid_types btrfs_bg_flags_to_raid_index(u64 flags)
>> +{
>> + if (flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10)
>> + return BTRFS_RAID_RAID10;
>> + else if (flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1)
>> + return BTRFS_RAID_RAID1;
>> + else if (flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP)
>> + return BTRFS_RAID_DUP;
>> + else if (flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID0)
>> + return BTRFS_RAID_RAID0;
>> + else if (flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5)
>> + return BTRFS_RAID_RAID5;
>> + else if (flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6)
>> + return BTRFS_RAID_RAID6;
>> +
>> + return BTRFS_RAID_SINGLE; /* BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SINGLE */
>> +}
>> +
>> void btrfs_update_commit_device_size(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info);
>> void btrfs_update_commit_device_bytes_used(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>> struct btrfs_transaction *transaction);
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
