Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Fix UAF

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 01/29/2018 03:01 PM, Nikolay Borisov wrote:


On 29.01.2018 04:38, Anand Jain wrote:


On 01/26/2018 09:20 PM, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
Commit 4fde46f0cc71 ("Btrfs: free the stale device") introduced
btrfs_free_stale_device which iterates the device lists for all
registered btrfs filesystems and deletes those devices which aren't
mounted. In a btrfs_devices structure has only 1 device attached to it
and it is unused then btrfs_free_stale_devices will proceed to also
free the btrfs_fs_devices struct itself. Currently this leads to a UAF
since list_for_each_entry will try to perform a check on the already-
freed memory to see if it has to terminated the loop.

The fix is to use 'break' when we know we are freeing the current
fs_devs.

  No break is needed as we need to iterate all stale devices and delete
  the found stale entry, so commit [1] used list_for_each_entry_safe()
  and removed the break,

We only do the break if we know we have a single device in the current
fs_devs struct. And executing free_fs_devices would have already freed
the device + fs_devs.


  [1]
   commit 38cf665d338fca33af4b16f9ec7cad6637fc0fec
   Author: Anand Jain <Anand.Jain@xxxxxxxxxx>
     btrfs: make btrfs_free_stale_device() to iterate all stales


  I am guessing UAF might be in[2], instead ?

  [2]
     free_fs_devices(fs_devs)
::
         while (!list_empty(&fs_devices->devices)) {
                 device = list_entry(fs_devices->devices.next,
                                     struct btrfs_device, dev_list);

It's not that, I thought so at first. But here using list_empty you are
awlays accessing the head the of the list, which is guaranteed to be
valid since you do the freeing of fs_devices outside of the while loop.

break when num_devices == 1 is fine;

  Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks, Anand


Thanks, Anand

Fixes: 4fde46f0cc71 ("Btrfs: free the stale device")
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@xxxxxxxx>

---
   fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 1 +
   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index f7147740b68e..c3ab55336ee0 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -645,6 +645,7 @@ static void btrfs_free_stale_devices(const char
*path,
                   btrfs_sysfs_remove_fsid(fs_devs);
                   list_del(&fs_devs->list);
                   free_fs_devices(fs_devs);
+                break;
               } else {
                   fs_devs->num_devices--;
                   list_del(&dev->dev_list);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux