This regression is introduced in
commit 3d48d9810de4 ("btrfs: Handle uninitialised inode eviction").
There are two problems,
a) it is ->destroy_inode() that does the final free on inode, not
->evict_inode(),
b) clear_inode() must be called before ->evict_inode() returns.
This could end up hitting BUG_ON(inode->i_state != (I_FREEING | I_CLEAR));
in evict() because I_CLEAR is set in clear_inode().
Fixes: commit 3d48d9810de4 ("btrfs: Handle uninitialised inode eviction")
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # v4.7-rc6+
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index 281a250..bc6ef73 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -5286,7 +5286,7 @@ void btrfs_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
trace_btrfs_inode_evict(inode);
if (!root) {
- kmem_cache_free(btrfs_inode_cachep, BTRFS_I(inode));
+ clear_inode(inode);
return;
}
--
2.9.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
