Re: [PATCH] btrfs: correct wrong comment about magic number of index_cnt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 11:08:03AM +0800, Su Yue wrote:
> There is no function named btrfs_get_inode_index_count.
> Explanation for magic number index_cnt=2 in btrfs_new_inode() is
> actually located in btrfs_set_inode_index_count().
> 
> So replace 'btrfs_get_inode_index_count' in the comment by
> 'btrfs_set_inode_index_count'.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Added to 4.16 queue, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux