Sorry, the two patches are same. Please the latter one. Thanks, Su On 01/12/2018 11:08 AM, Su Yue wrote:
There is no function named btrfs_get_inode_index_count. Explanation for magic number index_cnt=2 in btrfs_new_inode() is actually located in btrfs_set_inode_index_count(). So replace 'btrfs_get_inode_index_count' in the comment by 'btrfs_set_inode_index_count'. Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index 37bdb78b4766..f6454719192e 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -6315,7 +6315,7 @@ static struct inode *btrfs_new_inode(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, } /* * index_cnt is ignored for everything but a dir, - * btrfs_get_inode_index_count has an explanation for the magic + * btrfs_set_inode_index_count has an explanation for the magic * number */ BTRFS_I(inode)->index_cnt = 2;
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
