It's not used outside of extent-tree so there is no reason to not be
static.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@xxxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index b9c72c35e457..271f13bad41a 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -5771,7 +5771,7 @@ static int btrfs_inode_rsv_refill(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
* This is the same as btrfs_block_rsv_release, except that it handles the
* tracepoint for the reservation.
*/
-void btrfs_inode_rsv_release(struct btrfs_inode *inode)
+static void btrfs_inode_rsv_release(struct btrfs_inode *inode)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = inode->root->fs_info;
struct btrfs_block_rsv *global_rsv = &fs_info->global_block_rsv;
--
2.7.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
