On 01/10/2018 12:13 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 10:46:23PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
Instead of pointer to btrfs_fs_devices from device_list_add() its
better to get pointer to btrfs_device, then we have both, pointer
to btrfs_device and btrfs_fs_devices. This is needed in preparation
to add handling reappearing missing device feature.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@xxxxxxxxxx>
Can we just change device_list_add to return struct btrfs_device * instead, and
just do PTR_ERR() if there's a problem? Thanks,
That's much better. Will do.
Thanks, Anand
Josef
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
