Re: [Bug-tar] [PATCH] Re: Detection of sparse files is broken on btrfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday, January 9, 2018 8:59:06 AM CET Paul Eggert wrote:
> Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > So what about special casing that filesystem, where we can lseek() for
> > holes anyway?
> 
> If we can lseek for holes, then why not just do that?

Checking whether lseek() actually works costs some additional syscalls _per
sparse_ file;  checking for ST_NBLOCKS() is without this penalty.

> We shouldn't need special-case code for btrfs per se. Any filesystem
> where we can lseek for holes should take advantage of that optimization.

It is done so actually, the 'wholesparse' is another optimization on top
of that (but usable also in cases where SEEK_HOLE isn't defined at all).

Pavel



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux