Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Remove unused btrfs_start_transaction_lflush function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On  2.01.2018 18:17, David Sterba wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:06:18PM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>> Commit 0e8c36a9fd81 ("Btrfs: fix lots of orphan inodes when the space
>> is not enough") changed the way transaction reservation is made in
>> btrfs_evict_node and as a result this function became unused. This has
>> been the status quo for 5 years in which time no one noticed, so I'd
>> say it's safe to assume it's unlikely it will ever be used again.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@xxxxxxxx>
> 
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=142117508730660&w=2
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=142119399504907&w=2
> 
> "Transcaction API, removing the func does not make sense without
> removing BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_LIMIT at the same time."

I can't quite understand what you are saying. There are couple of more
places where BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_LIMIT is used outside of the
transaction api (btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata, btrfs_evict_inode and
reserve_metadata_space). Do you mean those function should also remove
the usage of FLUSH_LIMIT?


> 
>> ---
>>  fs/btrfs/transaction.c | 10 +---------
>>  fs/btrfs/transaction.h |  3 ---
>>  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
>> index 5a8c2649af2f..b1793688c716 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
>> @@ -542,7 +542,7 @@ start_transaction(struct btrfs_root *root, unsigned int num_items,
>>  	 * and then we deadlock with somebody doing a freeze.
>>  	 *
>>  	 * If we are ATTACH, it means we just want to catch the current
>> -	 * transaction and commit it, so we needn't do sb_start_intwrite(). 
>> +	 * transaction and commit it, so we needn't do sb_start_intwrite().
> 
> Unrelated change.
> 
>>  	 */
>>  	if (type & __TRANS_FREEZABLE)
>>  		sb_start_intwrite(fs_info->sb);
>> @@ -658,14 +658,6 @@ struct btrfs_trans_handle *btrfs_start_transaction_fallback_global_rsv(
>>  	return trans;
>>  }
>>  
>> -struct btrfs_trans_handle *btrfs_start_transaction_lflush(
>> -					struct btrfs_root *root,
>> -					unsigned int num_items)
>> -{
>> -	return start_transaction(root, num_items, TRANS_START,
>> -				 BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_LIMIT, true);
>> -}
>> -
>>  struct btrfs_trans_handle *btrfs_join_transaction(struct btrfs_root *root)
>>  {
>>  	return start_transaction(root, 0, TRANS_JOIN, BTRFS_RESERVE_NO_FLUSH,
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/transaction.h b/fs/btrfs/transaction.h
>> index c55e44560103..9b25b0ba92ee 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/transaction.h
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/transaction.h
>> @@ -187,9 +187,6 @@ struct btrfs_trans_handle *btrfs_start_transaction_fallback_global_rsv(
>>  					struct btrfs_root *root,
>>  					unsigned int num_items,
>>  					int min_factor);
>> -struct btrfs_trans_handle *btrfs_start_transaction_lflush(
>> -					struct btrfs_root *root,
>> -					unsigned int num_items);
>>  struct btrfs_trans_handle *btrfs_join_transaction(struct btrfs_root *root);
>>  struct btrfs_trans_handle *btrfs_join_transaction_nolock(struct btrfs_root *root);
>>  struct btrfs_trans_handle *btrfs_attach_transaction(struct btrfs_root *root);
>> -- 
>> 2.7.4
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux