Re: btrfs-transacti hammering the system

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Right. The file system is 48T, with 17T available, so we're not quite pushing it yet.

So far so good on the space_cache=v2 mount. I'm surprised this isn't on the gotcha page in the wiki; it may end up making a world of difference to the users here

Thanks again,
Matt

On 01/12/17 13:24, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
On 12/01/2017 06:57 PM, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
On 12/01/17 18:34, Matt McKinnon wrote:
Thanks, I'll give space_cache=v2 a shot.

Yes, very much recommended.

My mount options are: rw,relatime,space_cache,autodefrag,subvolid=5,subvol=/

Turn autodefrag off and use noatime instead of relatime.

Your filesystem also seems very full,

We don't know. btrfs fi df only displays allocated space. And that being
full is good, it means not too much free space fragments everywhere.

that's bad with every filesystem but
*especially* with btrfs because the allocator has to work really hard to find
free space for COWing. Really consider deleting stuff or adding more space.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux