On Wed 29-11-17 13:38:26, Chris Mason wrote: > On 11/29/2017 12:05 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > >On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 09:03:30AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote: > >>Hello, > >> > >>On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 05:56:08PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > >>>What has happened with this patch set? > >> > >>No idea. cc'ing Chris directly. Chris, if the patchset looks good, > >>can you please route them through the btrfs tree? > > > >lol looking at the patchset again, I'm not sure that's obviously the > >right tree. It can either be cgroup, block or btrfs. If no one > >objects, I'll just route them through cgroup. > > We'll have to coordinate a bit during the next merge window but I don't have > a problem with these going in through cgroup. Dave does this sound good to > you? Also I was wondering about another thing: How does this play with Josef's series for metadata writeback (Metadata specific accouting and dirty writeout)? Would the per-inode selection of cgroup writeback still be needed when Josef's series is applied since metadata writeback then won't be associated with any particular mapping anymore? Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
