Re: A partially failing disk in raid0 needs replacement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Chris,

>
> I assume when you get that, either when deleting the device or
> scrubbing, that you also see the device unrecoverable read error in
> dmesg, as originally reported. If the drive must have the information
> on that lost sector, and you can't increase SCT ERC time (as well as
> the kernel SCSI command timer), or increasing it doesn't help, then
> that data is lost. It's plausible btrfs check repair is smart enough
> to be able to reconstruct this missing data, but I suspect it isn't
> yet that capable.

That's the 'fun' part: I don't get any kernel messages after changing
the disk, hence my assumption that it's a relatively small, logical
error somewhere on the fs.

>
> So my recommendation is to prepare to lose the file system. Which
> means backing up whatever you can while it's still working, such as it
> is.

Yeah, luckily I can temporarily borrow a couple of 3TB disks to host
the data while I rebuild the fs. So that will probably be what I do.

It there any way I can remove just files with bad data from the disk
error so I just get those out of the way?

Thanks

/klaus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux