On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 06:41:28PM +0800, Gu Jinxiang wrote: > The following test failed becasuse share_data_ref be added into > extent_cache when deal with root tree node. The whole function run_next_block would need to be revisited with respect to error handling and sanity checks. Adding them only when a fuzzed image hits the particular code path is not IMHO the best approach. If there's some fuzzed test case, we should try to find all similar missing checks and fix them before moving to another type. Addressing only the failed tests gives a false sense of fixing, there are usally more similar bugs. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
